Self-face advantage and social threat: Cross-cultural aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2023-5-2-161-168

Keywords:

self-face advantage, social threat, face recognition, university students, experiment

Abstract

Introduction. Self-face advantage is related to a faster response that adult people have to their own face compared to other visual stimuli. Research in self-face advantage generally focuses on two social characteristics: social threat and cultural differences. The reported study investigated cross-cultural aspects of the relationship between social threat and self-face advantage. We expected to find cross-cultural differences in the reaction time to one’s own face in social situations involving high and low threat. The data on the Russian sample were compared with American and Chinese samples.

Materials and methods. The sample consisted of 20 Russian undergraduate students who were asked to identify orientations of self-face in visual trials involving low and high social threats. In experimental sets, the level of social threat was moderated by the images of university professors that induced high or low level of social anxiety. The sets were constructed individually for each participant. The reaction time and the response accuracy were registered for each trial.

Results. We have found some differences in the reaction time to one’s own face in different social situations involving high and low threats in Russian, American, and Chinese samples. First, Russian students tend to show a lower level of social fears. Second, their self-face advantage is less susceptible to the “boss effect” in comparison with Chinese and Americans students. Gender as a source of social threat also contributes to the magnitude of the “boss effect”.

Conclusion. The results can be used by psychologists providing support for university students. The obtained data may also become the foundation for complex and large-scale experimental models.

References

Bortolon, C., Raffard, S. (2018) Self-face advantage over familiar and unfamiliar faces: A three-level meta-analytic approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1287–1300. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1487-9 (In English)

Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., Laureys, S. (2006) One’s own face is hard to ignore. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500343678 (In English)

Devue, C., Bredart, S. (2011) The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.007 (In English)

Devue, C., van der Stigchel, S., Brédart, S., Theeuwes, J. (2009) You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Cognition, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.003 (In English)

Gallup, G. G. Jr. (1977) Self-recognition in primates: A comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. American Psychologist, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.5.329 (In English)

Geng, H., Zhang, S., Li, Q. et al. (2012) Dissociations of subliminal and supraliminal self-face from other-face processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2933–2942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.040 (In English)

Guan, L., Qi, M., Li, H. et al. (2015) Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing. Brain Research, vol. 1608, pp. 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.002 (In English)

Guan, L., Qi, M., Zhang, Q., Yang, J. (2014) The neural basis of self-face recognition after self-concept threat and comparison with important others. Social Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.920417 (In English)

Guan, L., Wu, T., Yang, J. et al. (2020) Self-esteem and cultural worldview buffer mortality salience effects on responses to self-face: Distinct neural mediators. Biological Psychology, vol. 155, article 107944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107944 (In English)

Gunji, A., Inagaki, M., Inoue, Y. et al. (2009) Event-related potentials of self-face recognition in children with pervasive developmental disorders. Brain Development, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2008.04.011 (In English)

Keyes, H., Brady, N. (2010) Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 840–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003611264 (In English)

Leary, M. R. (1983) A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283093007 (In English)

Liu, M., He, X., Rotsthein, P., Sui, J. (2016) Dynamically orienting your own face facilitates the automatic attraction of attention. Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 1-4, pp. 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1044428 (In English)

Liew, S. L., Ma, Y., Han, S., Aziz-Zadeh, L. (2011) Who’s afraid of the boss: Cultural differences in social hierarchies modulate self-face recognition in Chinese and Americans. PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 2, article e16901. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016901 (In English)

Ma, Y., Han, S. (2009) Self-face advantage is modulated by social threat—Boss effect on self-face recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1048–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.008 (In English)

Ma, Y., Han, S. (2010) Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015797 (In English)

Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 (In English)

Pannese, A., Hirsch, J. (2011) Self-face enhances processing of immediately preceding invisible faces. Neuropsychologia, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 564–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.019 (In English)

Platek, S. M., Thomson, J. W., Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2004) Crossmodal self-recognition: The role of visual, auditory, and olfactory primes. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2003.10.001 (In English)

Rochat, P., Broesch, T., Jayne, K. (2012) Social awareness and early self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.04.007 (In English)

Sui, J., Liu, C. H., Han, S. (2009) Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910802674825 (In English)

Sui, J., Zhu, Y., Han, S. (2006) Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000203357.65190.61 (In English)

Tsakiris, M. (2008) Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 12, article e4040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004040 (In English)

Tong, F., Nakayama, K. (1999) Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1016–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1016 (In English)

Qiana, H., Wang, Z., Yan, L., Gao, X. (2017) Aging strikes the self-face advantage in featural processing. Experimental Aging Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2017.1333834 (In English)

Published

2023-07-12

Issue

Section

Articles