Ethical and psychological foundations of socio-natural interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-3-257-272Keywords:
ethical and psychological foundations, socio-natural interaction, moral foundations, moral and ethical responsibility, global environmental problems concern, biocentrism, ethical choice, natural and humanistic worldviewAbstract
Introduction: This article focuses on identifying moral foundations influencing the development of new views on the interaction between nature and society. Particular attention is paid to the historical aspect in the identification of human moral reflections and human interaction with the natural world, demonstrating the connections between natural sciences, humanities and the moral aspect of human consciousness. Different Russian and international schools of thought on the interaction between society and nature have been considered, including those identifying moral foundations driving the assessment of the interaction between nature and society: dispositional and orientational approach, the value and positional approach, and moral and notional approach. The relevance of the study of the place and role of moral assessment of environmental problems in young people is underscored.
Materials and methods: We present the results of an empirical study into the interaction between environmental positions, moral outlook and ethical foundations in students. The study used novel psychological assessment tools: personal moral and ethical responsibility assessment tool, EcO-30 environmental positions assessment tool and moral foundations survey.
Results of the study: The obtained empirical data was used to build correlational and regressive statistical models. It has been observed that women’s choices are influenced by the moral foundation of “care” more often than men’s. Men demonstrate lower levels of environmental internality, biocentrism and general interest in environmental issues. In study participants reflection on moral and ethical situations is linked to biocentrism, while altruistic emotions are linked to both biocentrism and one’s interest in environmental issues. The regression model we built demonstrates the important role that reflection on global environmental issues plays in one’s moral and ethical sphere. It has been observed that increased existential responsibility is linked to lower interest in global environmental issues. Men demonstrate much lower rate of interest in global environmental issues.
Conclusion: The data obtained makes it possible to interpret the psychological effects of the interaction between the personal values we studied and has predictive value. We observe that the ethical foundations for assessing one’s notions of the interaction between nature and society can be found at the interface between their personal moral characteristics and the structural elements of the environmental outlook.
References
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
Ачинович, Т. И. (2020) Характеристики нравственной сферы личности студентов-психологов в ситуации морального выбора. Психология человека в образовании, т. 2, № 3, с. 220–229. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-3-220-229
Василюк, Ф. Е. (1984) Психология переживания. М.: МГУ, 200 с.
Вернадский, В. И. (1988) Философские мысли натуралиста. М.: Наука, 520 с.
Веселова, Е. К. (2009) Совесть как психологический феномен. Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 12. Психология. Социология. Педагогика, вып. 4, с. 127–135.
Виноградов, П. Н., Пархоменко, О. Г., Яркин, П. А., Ефимова, И. А. (2019) Ценности и выбор человеком нравственной позиции при взаимодействии с природными объектами. Научное мнение, № 11, с. 57–63. https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2019.11.57.63
Виноградов, П. Н. (2020) Нравственная регуляция экологической активности жителей города. В кн.: В. И. Панов (ред.). Экопсихологические исследования-6: экология детства и психология устойчивого развития. М.: ПИ РАО; Курск: Университетская книга, с. 26–30.
Виноградов, П. Н., Яркин, П. А. (2019a) Исследование этических оснований отношения человека к природным объектам. В кн.: Герценовские чтения: психологические исследования в образовании. Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции. Санкт-Петербург, 10–11 октября 2019 г. Вып. 2. СПб.: РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, с. 789–797. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-98
Виноградов, П. Н., Яркин, П. А. (2019b) Исследование коллективного экологического сознания посредством анализа композиционно свободных текстов. Письма в Эмиссия.Оффлайн, № 3, статья 2713. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2019/2713.htm (дата обращения 29.06.2021).
Виноградов, П. Н., Ефимова, И. А. (2017) Соотношение экологических установок и ценностей подростков. В кн.: Е. Ю. Коржова, А. В. Микляева (ред.). Интегративный подход к психологии человека и социальному взаимодействию людей: векторы развития современной психологической науки. Материалы VII Всероссийской научно-практической конференции 12–14 апреля 2017 г. Т. 1. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, с. 40–47.
Виноградов, П. Н., Кириллов, П. Н. (2003) Экологические ориентации как категория экологической психологии. В кн.: Ежегодник Российского психологического общества. Материалы III Всероссийского съезда психологов 25–28 июня 2003 г. Т. 2. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, с. 113–117.
Виноградов, П. Н. (2002) Экологическое мировоззрение как ценность. В кн.: Человек и ценности в XXI веке. Материалы международного семинара. СПб.: СПБФ «Истинная помощь людям», с. 30–41.
Дерябо, С. Д. (1997) Природный объект как отражаемый субъект. В кн.: Д. А. Леонтьев, В. Г. Щур (ред.). Психология с человеческим лицом: гуманистическая перспектива в постсоветской психологии. М.: Смысл, с. 223–230.
Дорст, Ж. (1968) До того как умрет природа. М.: Прогресс, 415 с.
Кавтарадзе, Д. Н., Брудный, А. А. (2012) Основы экологического мировоззрения как задача образования для устойчивого развития. М.: ФИРО, 63 с.
Кириллов, П. Н. (2002) Экологические ориентации учащихся и их формирование в условиях интерактивного обучения. Диссертация на соискание степени кандидата психологических наук. СПб., РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, 163 с.
Кряж, И. В. (2013) Психология смысловой регуляции экологически релевантного поведения. Диссертация на соискание степени доктора психологических наук. Харьков, Харьковский национальный университет им. В. Н. Каразина, 435 с.
Леонтьев, Д. А. (2003) Психология смысла: природа, строение и динамика смысловой реальности. М.: Смысл, 487 с.
Леопольд, О. (1983) Календарь песчаного графства. М.: Мир, 243 с.
Манеров, В. Х., Ван, Х., Карпова, С. В. (2020) Совесть, нравственность и развитие личности. В кн.: И. А. Баева, А. А. Баканова (ред.). Психологическое сопровождение личности в меняющемся мире. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, с. 47–57.
Нартова-Бочавер, С. К., Мухортова, Е. А., Ирхин, Б. Д. (2020) Взаимодействие с миром растений как источник позитивного функционирования человека. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, т. 28, № 2, с. 151–169. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280209
Нестик, Т. А., Журавлев, А. Л. (2018) Психология глобальных рисков. М.: ИП РАН, 402 с.
Панов, В. И. (2014) Экопсихология. Парадигмальный поиск. СПб.: Нестор-История, 296 с.
Панов, В. И., Лидская, Э. В. (2012) Концепция устойчивого развития: экологическое мышление, сознание, ответственность. Вестник МГГУ им. М. А. Шолохова, № 1, с. 38–50.
Печчеи, А. (1985) Человеческие качества. 2-е изд. М.: Прогресс, 312 с.
Самойлова, С. В. (2018) Взаимосвязь экологического сознания с отношением к себе и миру лиц с проэкологической активностью. Выпускная квалификационная работа (бакалавриат). Челябинск, ЮУрГУ (на правах рукописи), 93 с.
Смолова, Л. В. (2012) Вклад психологии взаимодействия с окружающей средой в формирование нового типа сознания для решения экологических проблем. Вестник Русской Христианской Гуманитарной Академии, т. 13, вып. 1, с. 187–198.
Сычев, О. А., Беспалов, А. М. Прудникова, М. М., Власов, М. С. (2016) Особенности моральных оснований у монгольских, немецких и российских подростков. Культурноисторическая психология, т. 12, № 1, c. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120109
Сычев, О. А., Протасова, И. Н., Белоусов, К. И. (2018) Диагностика моральных оснований: апробация русскоязычной версии опросника MFQ. Российский психологический журнал, т. 15, № 3, с. 88–115. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.3.5
Тимощук, И. Г. (2004) Диагностический инструментарий исследования некоторых аспектов ответственности у студентов-психологов. Практична психологія та соціальна робота, № 8, с. 37–40.
Тимощук, И. Г. (2016) Ответственность практического психолога: исследование семантики понятия. В кн.: Проблемы современного педагогического образования. Сер.: Педагогика и психология. Вып. 50. Ч. 2. Ялта: РИО ГПА, с. 219–226.
Чердымова, Е. И. (2010) «Экологическое сознание» и «экологическая культура» в модели экологического образования. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук, т. 12, № 3-1, c. 137–140.
Швейцер, А. (1992) Благоговение перед жизнью. М.: Прогресс, 572 с.
Шмелева, И. А. (2006) Психология экологического сознания. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 204 с.
Ясвин, В. А. (2000) Психология отношения к природе. М.: Смысл, 456 с.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (2000) Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116
Berke, P. R., Conroy, M. M. (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S. et al. (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: P. Devine, A. Plant (eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 47. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Horlings, L. (2015) The inner dimension of sustainability: Personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 163–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.006
Jorgensen, B. S., Stedman, R. C. (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 233–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226
Kwon, S.-A., Kim, S., Lee, J. (2019) Analyzing the determinants of individual Action on climate change by specifying the roles of six values in South Korea. Sustainability. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, vol. 11, no. 7, article 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071834
Lalli, M. (1992) Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7
Masterson, V. A., Stedman, R. C., Enqvist, J. et al. (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecology and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, article 49. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08872-220149
Muhar, A., Raymond, C. M., Born, R. J. G. et al. (2018) A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 61, no. 5-6, pp. 756–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327424
Seamon, D. (2000) A way of seeing people and place: Phenomenology in envrionment-behavior research. In: S. Wapner, J. Demick, C. T. Yamamoto, H. Minami (eds.). Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior research. New York: Springer, pp. 157–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4701-3_13
Shamai, S. (1991) Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 347–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-k
Trentelman, C. K. (2009) Place attachment and community attachment: A primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and Natural Resources, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 191–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802191712
Wamsler, C., Brink, E. (2018) Mindsets for sustainability: Exploring the link between mindfulness and sustainable. Climate Adaptation, vol. 151, pp. 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029
REFERENCES
Achinovich, T. I. (2020) Kharakteristiki nravstvennoj sfery lichnosti studentov-psikhologov v situatsii moral’nogo vybora [Characteristics of the moral sphere of the personality of psychology students in a situation of moral choice]. Psikhologiya cheloveka v obrazovanii — Psychology in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 220–229. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-3-220-229 (In Russian)
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (2000) Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116 (In English)
Berke, P. R., Conroy, M. M. (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976081 (In English)
Cherdymova, E. I. (2010) “Ekologicheskoe soznanie” i “ekologicheskaya kul’tura” v modeli ekologicheskogo obrazovaniya [The diagnostic components of the terms “ecological culture” and “ecological consciousness”]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossijskoj akademii nauk — Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3-1, pp. 137–140. (In Russian)
Deryabo, S. D. (1997) Prirodnyj ob’ekt kak otrazhaemyj sub’ekt [Natural object as a reflected subject]. In: D. A. Leont’ev, V. G. Shchur (eds.). Psikhologiya s chelovecheskim litsom: gumanisticheskaya perspektiva v postsovetskoj psikhologii [Psychology with a human face: A humanist perspective in post-soviet psychology]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., pp. 223–230. (In Russian)
Dorst, Zh. (1968) Do togo kak umret priroda [Before nature dies]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 415 p. (In Russian)
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S. et al. (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: P. Devine, A. Plant (eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 47. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 (In English)
Horlings, L. (2015) The inner dimension of sustainability: Personal and cultural values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 163–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.006 (In English)
Jorgensen, B. S., Stedman, R. C. (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 233–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226 (In English)
Kavtaradze, D. N., Brudnyj, A. A. (2012) Osnovy ekologicheskogo mirovozzreniya kak zadacha obrazovaniya dlya ustojchivogo razvitiya [The foundations of the ecological worldview as a task of education for sustainable development]. Moscow: FIRO Publ., 63 p. (In Russian)
Kirillov, P. N. (2002) Ekologicheskie orientatsii uchashchikhsya i ikh formirovanie v usloviyakh interaktivnogo obucheniya [Environmental orientations of students and their formation in the context of interactive learning]. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 163 p. (In Russian)
Kryazh, I. V. (2013) Psikhologiya smyslovoj regulyatsii ekologicheski relevantnogo povedeniya [Psychology of semantic regulation of ecologically relevant behavior]. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Kharkiv, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 435 p. (In Russian)
Kwon, S.-A., Kim, S., Lee, J. (2019) Analyzing the determinants of individual action on climate change by specifying the roles of six values in South Korea. Sustainability. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, vol. 11, no. 7, article 1834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071834 (In English)
Lalli, M. (1992) Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80078-7 (In English)
Leont’ev, D. A. (2003) Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real’nosti [The psychology of meaning: The nature, structure and dynamics of meaningful reality]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 487 p. (In Russian)
Leopold, A. (1983) A sand county almanac. Moscow: Mir Publ., 243 p. (In Russian)
Manerov, V. Kh., Van, Kh., Karpova, S. V. (2020) Sovest’, nravstvennost’ i razvitie lichnosti [Conscience, morality and personal development]. In: I. A. Baeva, A. A. Bakanova (eds.). Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie lichnosti v menyayushchemsya mire [Psychological support of a person in a changing world]. Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., pp. 47–57. (In Russian)
Masterson, V. A., Stedman, R. C., Enqvist, J. et al. (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecology and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, article 49. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08872-220149 (In English)
Muhar, A., Raymond, C. M., Born, R. J. G. et al. (2018) A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 61, no. 5-6, pp. 756–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327424 (In English)
Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Mukhortova, E. A., Irkhin B. D. (2020) Vzaimodejstvie s mirom rastenij kak istochnik pozitivnogo funktsionirovaniya cheloveka [Interaction with the plant world as a source of positive human functioning]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya — Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 151–169. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280209 (In Russian)
Nestik, T. A., Zhuravlev, A. L. (2018) Psikhologiya global’nykh riskov [Psychology of global risks]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 402 p. (In Russian)
Panov, V. I. (2014) Ekopsikhologiya. Paradigmal’nyj poisk [Ecopsychology. Paradigmatic search]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 296 p. (In Russian)
Panov, V. I., Lidskaya, E. V. (2012) Kontseptsiya ustojchivogo razvitiya: ekologicheskoe myshlenie, soznanie, otvetstvennost’ [Sustainable development concept: Ecological thinking, consciousness, responsibility]. Vestnik MGGU im. M. A. Sholokhova, no. 1, pp. 38–50. (In Russian)
Peccei, A. (1985) The human quality. 2nd ed. Moscow: Progress Publ., 312 p. (In Russian)
Samojlova, S. V. (2018) Vzaimosvyaz’ ekologicheskogo soznaniya s otnosheniem k sebe i miru lits s proekologicheskoj aktivnost’yu [The relationship of ecological consciousness with the attitude towards themselves and the world of persons with pro-ecological activity]. Bachelor thesis. Chelyabinsk, South Ural State University (as a manuscript), 93 p. (In Russian)
Schweitzer, A. (1989) Reverence for life. Moscow: Progress Publ., 572 p. (In Russian)
Seamon, D. (2000) A way of seeing people and place: Phenomenology in envrionment-behavior research. In: S. Wapner, J. Demick, C. T. Yamamoto, H. Minami (eds.). Theoretical perspectives in environment-behavior research. New York: Springer, pp. 157–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4701-3_13 (In English)
Shamai, S. (1991) Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 347–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-k (In English)
Shmeleva, I. A. (2006) Psikhologiya ekologicheskogo soznaniya [Psychology of environmental consciousness]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 204 p. (In Russian)
Smolova, L. V. (2012) Vklad psikhologii vzaimodejstviya s okruzhayushchej sredoj v formirovanie novogo tipa soznaniya dlya resheniya ekologicheskikh problem [The contribution of the psychology of interaction with the environment in the formation of a new type of consciousness for solving environmental problems]. Vestnik Russkoj Khristianskoj Gumanitarnoj Akademii, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 187–198. (In Russian)
Sychev, O. A., Bespalov, A. M., Prudnikova, M. M., Vlasov, M. S. (2016) Osobennosti moral’nykh osnovanij u mongol’skikh, nemetskikh i rossijskikh podrostkov [Features of moral foundations in Mongolian, German and Russian adolescents]. Kul’turnoistoricheskaya psikhologiya — Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85–96. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120109 (In Russian)
Sychev, O. A., Protasova, I. N., Belousov, K. I. (2018) Diagnostika moral’nykh osnovanij: aprobatsiya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika MFQ [Diagnosing moral foundations: Testing of the Russian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire]. Rossijskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 88–115. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2018.3.5 (In Russian)
Timoshchuk, I. G. (2004) Diagnosticheskij instrumentarij issledovaniya nekotorykh aspektov otvetstvennosti u studentov-psikhologov [Diagnostic tools for studying some aspects of responsibility in psychology students]. Praktichna psikhologіya ta sotsіal’na robota, no. 8, pp. 37–40. (In Russian)
Timoshchuk, I. G. (2016) Otvetstvennost’ prakticheskogo psikhologa: issledovanie semantiki ponyatiya [The responsibility of a practical psychologist: A study of the semantics of a concept]. In: Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. Ser.: Pedagogika i psikhologiya [Problems of modern pedagogical education. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology]. Iss. 50. Pt 2. Yalta: RIO GPA Publ., pp. 219–226. (In Russian)
Trentelman, C. K. (2009) Place attachment and community attachment: A primer grounded in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and Natural Resources, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 191–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802191712 (In English)
Vasilyuk, F. E. (1984) Psikhologiya perezhivaniya [Psychology of experiencing]. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 200 p. (In Russian)
Vernadskij, V. I. (1988) Filosofskie mysli naturalista [Philosophical thoughts of a naturalist]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 520 p. (In Russian)
Veselova, E. K. (2009) Sovest’ kak psikhologicheskij fenomen [Conscience as a psychological phenomenon]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika — Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12. Psychology. Sociology. Education, no. 4, pp. 127–135. (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N. (2002) Ekologicheskoe mirovozzrenie kak tsennost’ [Environmental outlook as a value]. In: Chelovek i tsennosti v XXI veke. Materialy mezhdunarodnogo seminara [Man and values in the XXI century. Proceedings of the international seminar]. Saint Petersburg: SPBF “Istinnaya pomoshch’ lyudyam” Publ., pp. 30–41. (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N. (2020) Nravstvennaya regulyatsiya ekologicheskoj aktivnosti zhitelej goroda [Moral regulation of the ecological activity of city residents]. In: V. N. Panov (ed.). Ekopsikhologicheskie issledovaniya-6: ekologiya detstva i psikhologiya ustojchivogo razvitiya [Ecopsychological research-6: Childhood ecology and psychology of sustainable development]. Moscow: Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education Publ.; Kursk: Universitetskaya kniga Publ., pp. 26–30. (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N., Efimova, I. A. (2017) Sootnoshenie ekologicheskikh ustanovok i tsennostej podrostkov [The ratio of environmental attitudes and values of adolescents]. In: E. Yu. Korzhova, A. V. Miklyaeva (eds.). Integrativnyj podkhod k psikhologii cheloveka i sotsial’nomu vzaimodejstviyu lyudej: vektory razvitiya sovremennoj psikhologicheskoj nauki. Materialy VII Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii 12–14 aprelya 2017 g. [An integrative approach to human psychology and social interaction of people: Vectors of development of modern psychological science. Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference, 12–14 April, 2017]. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., pp. 40–47. (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N., Kirillov, P. N. (2003) Ekologicheskie orientatsii kak kategoriya ekologicheskoj psikhologii [Environmental orientation as a category of environmental psychology]. In: Ezhegodnik Rossijskogo psikhologicheskogo obshchestva. Materialy III Vserossijskogo s’ezda psikhologov 25–28 iyunya 2003 g. [Yearbook of the Russian Psychological Society. Proceedings of the 3rd All-Russian congress of psychologists, 25–28 June, 2003]. Vol. 2. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., pp. 113–117. (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N., Parkhomenko, O. G., Yarkin, P. A., Efimova, I. A. (2019) Tsennosti i vybor chelovekom nravstvennoj pozitsii pri vzaimodejstvii s prirodnymi ob’ektami [Values and the choice of a person’s moral position when interacting with natural objects]. Nauchnoe mnenie — The Scientific Opinion, no. 11, pp. 57–63. https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2019.11.57.63 (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N., Yarkin, P. A. (2019a) Issledovanie eticheskikh osnovanij otnosheniya cheloveka k prirodnym ob’ektam [Investigation of the ethical foundations of a person’s relationship to natural objects]. In: Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 10–11 oktyabrya 2019 g. [The Herzen University Studies: Psychology in Education Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference. St Petersburg, 10–11 October 2019]. Iss. 2. Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical Universuty Publ., pp. 789–797. https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2019-2-98 (In Russian)
Vinogradov, P. N., Yarkin, P. A. (2019b) Issledovanie kollektivnogo ekologicheskogo soznaniya posredstvom analiza kompozitsionno svobodnykh tekstov [Research of collective ecological consciousness through the analysis of compositionally free texts]. Pis’ma v Emissiya.Offlajn — The Emissia.Offline Letters, no. 3, article 2713. [Online]. Available at: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2019/2713.htm (accessed 29.06.2021). (In Russian)
Wamsler, C., Brink, E. (2018) Mindsets for sustainability: Exploring the link between mindfulness and sustainable. Climate Adaptation, vol. 151, pp. 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.029 (In English)
Yasvin, V. A. (2000) Psikhologiya otnosheniya k prirode [Psychology of attitude towards nature]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 456 p. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Pavel N. Vinogradov, Petr A. Yarkin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The work is provided under the terms of the Public Offer and of Creative Commons public license Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows an unlimited number of persons to reproduce and share the Licensed Material in all media and formats. Any use of the Licensed Material shall contain an identification of its Creator(s) and must be for non-commercial purposes only.
