Relationship between students’ mental representation of project activity experience and changes in their personal potential: The case of the student expedition ‘School Educational Environment’

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2025-7-4-476-491

Keywords:

self-efficacy, responsibility, life position, tolerance for uncertainty, narrative method, personal potential

Abstract

Introduction. This study investigates how students’ mental representation of their experience of uncertainty and self-efficacy in project activities aimed at transforming the educational environment relates to changes in personal potential parameters — tolerance for uncertainty, responsibility, professional self-efficacy, and life position — considering the presence, stability over time, and direction of change.

Materials and Methods. The study employed the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II) (D. McLain, adapted by D. Leontiev, E. Osin and E. Lukovitskaya); the Responsibility Scale (D. Leontiev); the Questionnaire of the Life Position of the Individual (D. Leontiev, A. Shilmanskaya); and General SelfEfficacy Scale (GSE) (R. Schwarzer, M. Jerusalem, and V. Romek, as adapted by T. Gordeeva). Additionally, a narrative method, a formative experiment, content analysis, and statistical analysis methods were used. The sample consisted of university students who participated in the student expedition.

Results. No significant changes in personal potential parameters were observed among students who did not form mental representations of the experience of uncertainty or who described their self-efficacy through a generalized representation of project activities. In contrast, students who had mental representations of the experience of uncertainty or provided a detailed description of the experience of self-efficacy exhibited multidirectional changes in personal potential parameters; over time, there was a recovery of parameters that may have temporarily decreased immediately after project activities.

Conclusions. The study confirmed the hypothesized relationship between students’ mental representation of the experience of uncertainty and their self-efficacy in project activities, which were aimed at developing parameters of their personal potential and resulted in changes to these parameters. These findings can be used to organize work aimed at developing students’ personal potential during professional training.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Веракса, Н. Е., Веракса, А. Н., Плотникова, В. А. (2023) Сюжетно-ролевая игра и проектная деятельность как факторы развития детей дошкольного возраста. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Психология и педагогика, т. 20, № 3, с. 431–445. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-3-431-445

Гришина, Г. В. (2024) Личностные ресурсы и адаптационный потенциал иностранных студентов в российском университете: эмпирическое исследование. Наука о человеке: гуманитарные исследования, т. 18, № 3, c. 157–167.

Замяткина, Н. А. (2022) Личностный потенциал студентов: сущность и подходы к трактовке. Педагогический журнал, т. 12, № 6А, ч. 1, с. 107–117.

Кудрявцев, В. Т. (2022) Амплификация — источник и инструмент развития. Культурно-историческая психология, т. 18, № 1, с. 4–5. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180100

Леонов, И. Н. (2014) Толерантность к неопределенности как психологический феномен: история становления конструкта. Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия Философия. Психология. Педагогика, № 4, с. 43–52.

Леонтович, А. В., Цветков, А. В. (2012) Экспедиция как форма реализации исследовательской педагогической технологии. Исследователь/Researcher, № 1–2, с. 338–344.

Леонтьев, Д. А. (2016) Саморегуляция, ресурсы и личностный потенциал. Сибирский психологический журнал, № 62, с. 18–37. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/62/3

Леонтьев, Д. А. (2024) От феномена самостоятельности к механизмам самодетерминации. Вопросы образования, № 1, с. 142–161. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17626

Леонтьев, Д. А. (2023) Личностный потенциал: оптика психологии. Образовательная политика, № 2 (94), с. 20–31.

Леонтьев, Д. А., Шильманская, А. Е. (2019) Жизненная позиция личности: от теории к операционализации. Вопросы психологии, № 1, с. 90–100.

Матяш, Н. В. (2014) Инновационные педагогические технологии. Проектное обучение. 3-е изд. М.: Академия, 160 c.

Неизвестный, С. И. (2017) Психологические факторы успешной проектной деятельности. Ученые записки Российского государственного социального университета, т. 16, № 2 (141), с. 47–54.

Рочева, О. А., Эшелиоглу, Р. И., Ноздрина, Н. А. (2024) Генезис личностного потенциала студентов в профессиональном плане. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, т. 15, № 1–2, c. 236–240.

Сафонцева, Н. Ю. (2024) Проблемно-проектное обучение как дидактическое условие развития личностного потенциала студентов. Инновации в образовании, № 10, с. 43–55.

Севостьянова, Е. Б. (2012) Возможности проектно-исследовательской деятельности учащихся-подростков в построении их активного взаимодействия с социальной средой. Психологическая наука и образование, т. 17, № 4, с. 34–41.

Сохранов-Преображенский, В. В. (2022) Самоорганизация личностного потенциала как фактор эффективной профессиональной подготовки студентов вуза. Педагогическое образование и наука, № 6, с. 115–120.

Шутенко, А. И., Шутенко, Е. Н., Деревянко, Ю. П. (2020) Применение информационных технологий как средств развития образовательных коммуникаций для реализации личностного потенциала студентов вуза. Сибирский педагогический журнал, № 6, с. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2006.08

Шутенко, Е. Н., Шутенко, А. И., Серебряная, М. В. (2022) Особенности активизации личностного потенциала студентов в условиях цифровизации вузовского обучения. Перспективы науки и образования, № 6 (60), с. 47–67. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.6.3

Ясвин, В. А. (2019) Школьная среда как предмет измерения: экспертиза, проектирование, управление. М.: Народное образование, 448 с.

Aizman, R. I Galai, I. A., Lebedev, A. V. (2019) The dynamics of personal potential of students learning at the pedagogical university in the metropolis and the regional center. MOJ Anatomy & Physiology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 190–194. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojap.2019.06.00271

Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company Publ., 604 p.

Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949) Intolerance of ambiguity as an educational and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 108–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x

Norton, R. W. (1975) Measure of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 607–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017) Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York; London: The Guilford Press, 756 p. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

REFERENCES

Aizman, R. I Galai, I. A., Lebedev, A. V. (2019) The dynamics of personal potential of students learning at the pedagogical university in the metropolis and the regional center. MOJ Anatomy & Physiology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 190–194. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojap.2019.06.00271 (In English)

Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company Publ., 604 p. (In English)

Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1949) Intolerance of ambiguity as an educational and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 108–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x (In English)

Grishina, G. V. (2024) Lichnostnye resursy i adaptatsionnyj potentsial inostrannykh studentov v rossijskom universitete: empiricheskoe issledovanie [Personal resources and adaptation potential of foreing students at a Russian university: Empirical study]. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya — The Science of Person: Humanitarian Researches, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 157–167. (In https://doi.org/10.57015/issn1998-5320.2024.18.3.15 Russian)

Kudryavtsev, V. T. (2022) Amplifikatsiya — istochnik i instrument razvitiya [Amplification: The source and tool of development]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya — Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 4–5. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180100 (In Russian)

Leonov, I. N. (2014) Tolerantnost’ k neopredelennosti kak psikhologicheskij fenomen: istoriya stanovleniya konstrukta [Tolerance for ambiguity as a psychological phenomenon: The history of a construct]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika — Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, no. 4, pp. 43–52. (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2016) Samoregulyatsiya, resursy i lichnostnyj potentsial [Autoregulation, resources, and personal potential]. Sibirskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal — Siberian Journal of Psychology, no. 62, pp. 18–37. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/62/3 (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2023) Lichnostnyj potentsial: optika psikhologii [Personal potential: Optics of psychology]. Obrazovatel’naya politika — Educational Policy, no. 2 (94), pp. 20–31. https://doi.org/10.22394/2078-838X-2023-2-20-31 (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2024) Ot fenomena samostoyatel’nosti k mekhanizmam samodeterminatsii [From the phenomenon of self-sufficiency to the mechanisms of self-determination]. Voprosy obrazovaniya — Educational Studies, no. 1, pp. 142–161. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17626 (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A., Shil’manskaya, A. E. (2019) Zhiznennaya pozitsiya lichnosti: ot teorii k operatsionalizatsii [Personal life position: Making theoretical notions operational]. Voprosy psikhologii, no. 1, pp. 90–100. (In Russian)

Leontovich, A. V., Tsvetkov, A. V. (2012) Ekspeditsiya kak forma realizatsii issledovatel’skoj pedagogicheskoj tekhnologii [Expedition as a form of implementation of research pedagogical technology]. Issledovatel’ — Researcher, no. 1–2, pp. 338–344. (In Russian)

Matyash, N. V. (2014) Innovatsionnye pedagogicheskie tekhnologii. Proektnoe obuchenie [Innovative pedagogical technologies. Project-based training]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Academy Publ., 160 p. (In Russian)

Neizvestnyj, S. I. (2017) Psikhologicheskie faktory uspeshnoj proektnoj deyatel’nosti [Psychological factors of successful project activities]. Uchenye zapiski Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’nogo universiteta — Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University, vol. 16, no. 2 (141), pp. 47–54. (In Russian)

Norton, R. W. (1975) Measure of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 607–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11 (In English)

Rocheva, O. A., Eshelioglu, R. I., Nozdrina, N. A. (2024) Genezis lichnostnogo potentsiala studentov v professional’nom plane [The genesis of students’ personal potential in professional terms]. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1–2, pp. 236–240. (In Russian)

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017) Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York; London: The Guilford Press, 756 p. (In https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806 English)

Safontseva, N. Yu. (2024) Problemno-proektnoe obuchenie kak didakticheskoe uslovie razvitiya lichnostnogo potentsiala studentov [Problem-based project training as a didactic condition for the development of personal potential]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii — Innovation in Education, no. 10, pp. 43–55. (In Russian)

Sevost’yanova, E. B. (2012) Vozmozhnosti proektno-issledovatel’skoj deyatel’nosti uchashchikhsya-podrostkov v postroenii ikh aktivnogo vzaimodejstviya s sotsial’noj sredoj [Perspectives of research and project activities in adolescent students used for building their active interaction with social environment]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye — Psychological Science and Education, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 34–41. (In Russian)

Sokhranov-Preobrazhenskij, V. V. (2022) Samoorganizatsiya lichnostnogo potentsiala kak faktor effektivnoj professional’noj podgotovki studentov vuza [Self-organization of personal potential as a factor in effective professional development of university students]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye i nauka — Pedagogical Education and Science, no. 6, pp. 115–120. (In Russian)

Shutenko, A. I., Shutenko, E. N., Derevyanko, Yu. P. (2020) Primenenie informatsionnykh tekhnologij kak sredstv razvitiya obrazovatel’nykh kommunikatsij dlya realizatsii lichnostnogo potentsiala studentov vuza [The uce of information technology as tools of developing educational communications for realizing the personal potential of university students]. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal — Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 6, pp. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2006.08 (In Russian)

Shutenko, E. N., Shutenko, A. I., Serebryanaya, M. V. (2022) Osobennosti aktivizatsii lichnostnogo potentsiala studentov v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii vuzovskogo obucheniya [The specificity of activating the personal potential of students in the context of digitalization of university education]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya — Perspectives of Science and Education, no. 6 (60), pp. 47–67. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.6.3 (In Russian)

Veraksa, N. E., Veraksa, A. N., Plotnikova, V. A. (2023) Syuzhetno-rolevaya igra i proektnaya deyatel’nost’ kak faktory razvitiya detej doshkol’nogo vozrasta [Pretend play and project-based learning as factors in the development of preschool children]. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika — RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 431–445. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2023-20-3-431-445 (In Russian)

Zamyatkina, N. A. (2022) Lichnostnyj potentsial studentov: sushchnost’ i podkhody k traktovke [Personal potential of students: Essence and approaches to interpretation]. Pedagogicheskij zhurnal — Pedagogical Journal, vol. 12, no. 6–1, pp. 107–117. (In Russian)

Yasvin, V. A. (2019) School environment as an object of measurement: examination, design, management. Moscow: Public education, 448 p. (In Russian)

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Maksimova, L. A., Valiev, R. A., Brusnitsyna, G. G., & Galaguzova, Y. N. (2025). Relationship between students’ mental representation of project activity experience and changes in their personal potential: The case of the student expedition ‘School Educational Environment’. Psychology in Education, 7(4), 476–491. https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2025-7-4-476-491

Issue

Section

Articles