Self-actualization profile for representatives of different professions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-3-236-246

Keywords:

self-actualization, growth, development, a self-actualization profile, helping professions, creative professions, military personnel, entrepreneurship, professions in the sphere of information technologies

Abstract

The paper presents the results of a research on similarities and differences between the components of a self-actualization profile for representatives of different types of professions. The study involved respondents from 5 professional groups: helping professions, creative professions, professions in the spheres of business entrepreneurship and information technologies, and military professions (100 people in each sample). The results suggest that flexibility in their behaviour and interaction with others is a significant component of the self-actualization profile for all sample groups. However, other prominent components differ from one group to another. For instance, representatives of helping professions are more communicative; they have a more positive view of human nature and trust in the dominance of merits. Representatives of creative professions are more creative, sensitive, and spontaneous. They are capable of reflecting on their needs and interests, unreserved in their behaviour and open in expressing their feelings; they strive to create and derive pleasure from creative activity. The entrepreneurs involved in the study appear more “internally guided”, they show independence, guided by their own principles and beliefs, and appreciate the value of growth and development. They know their own worth, and they show self-awareness and self-respect. However, being part of the business world, they may have a somewhat negative perception of human nature, and may not believe in kindness or generosity. The respondents representing IT-professions are more inclined to embrace themselves regardless of external evaluation of their merits and demerits, and have a positive view of human nature. The self-actualization profile of the military differs rather significantly from the others. They tend to live for the moment more than the representatives of the other professional groups; they appreciate and respect themselves, accept themselves for what they are with all their strengths and weaknesses, and are also more inclined to accept irritation, anger, and aggression as natural manifestations of human nature. In addition, they seek to learn and to understand the world around them more than the others. At the same time, they are less communicative and show lower degrees of sensitivity and spontaneity in manifesting their feelings and desires.

References

ЛИТЕРАТУРА

Абульханова-Славская, К. А. (1991) Стратегии жизни. М.: Мысль, 299 с.

Акиндинова, И. А. (2000) Самоактуализация личности в различных типах организации профессиональной деятельности. В кн.: В. Н. Панферов (ред.). Психолого-педагогические проблемы развития личности в современных условиях: Психология и педагогика в общественной практике. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А. И. Герцена, с. 29–36.

Артемьева, Т. И. (1981) Взаимосвязь потенциального и актуального в развитии личности. В кн.: Л. И. Анцыферова (ред.). Психология формирования и развития личности. М.: Наука, с. 67–87.

Галажинский, Э. В. (2002) Детерминация и направленность самореализации личности. Томск: Изд-во ТГУ, 212 с.

Гозман, Л. Я., Кроз, М. В., Латинская, М. В. (1995) Самоактуализационный тест. М.: Российское педагогическое агентство, 43 с.

Головаха, Е. И. (1988) Жизненная перспектива и профессиональное самоопределение молодежи. Киев: Наукова думка, 142 с.

Егорычева, И. Д. (2005) Самореализация как деятельность (к постановке проблемы). Мир психологии, № 3 (43), с. 11–33.

Коростылева, Л. А. (2000) Психология самореализации личности: брачно-семейные отношения. СПб.: Издательство СПбГУ, 292 с.

Кулешов, С. М. (2011) Управление профессиональной карьерой офицерского корпуса. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени кандидата социальных наук. М., Военный университет, 25 с.

Леонтьев, Д. А. (2000) Психология свободы: к постановке проблемы самодетерминаций личности. Психологический журнал, т. 21, № 1, с. 15–25.

Поваренков, Ю. П., Самаль, Е. В. (2014) Профессиональная самоактуализация личности: системогенетический подход. Ярославль: ЯГПУ им. К. Д. Ушинского, 328 с.

Русалов, В. М. (2006) Психологическая зрелость: единая или множественная характеристика? Психологический журнал, № 5, с. 83–91.

Самаль, Е. В. (2008) Самоактуализация личности в процессе обучения в вузе. Диссертация на соискание степени кандидата психологических наук. Ярославль, ЯГПУ им. К. Д. Ушинского, 245 с.

Сергиенко, Е. А. (2007) Зрелость: молярный или модулярный подход? В кн.: А. Л. Журавлев, Е. А. Сергиенко (ред.). Феномен и категория зрелости в психологии. М.: Институт психологии РАН, с. 13–28.

Столярская, Е. В. (2001) Особенности самовосприятия и самоактуализации личности. Псіхалогія, № 2, с. 5–11.

Ященко, Е. Ф. (2006) Особенности самоактуализации студентов с разной профессиональной направленностью. Психологический журнал, т. 27, № 3, с. 31–41.

Goldstein, K. (1939) The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Co., 533 р.

REFERENCES

Abul’khanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1991) Strategii zhizni [Strategy of life]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 299 p. (In Russian)

Akindinova, I. A. (2000) Samoaktualizatsiya lichnosti v razlichnykh tipakh organizatsii professional’noj deyatel’nosti [Self-actualization of personality in various types of the organization of professional activity]. In: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy razvitiya lichnosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh: Psikhologiya i pedagogika v obshchestvennoj praktike [Psychological and pedagogical problems of personal development in modern conditions: Psychology and pedagogics in public practice]. Saint Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., pp. 29–36. (In Russian)

Artem’eva, T. I. (1981) Vzaimosvyaz’ potentsial’nogo i aktual’nogo v razvitii lichnosti [Potential and relevant interrelation in personal development]. In: L. I. Antsyferova (ed.). Psikhologiya formirovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti [Psychology of personal formation and development]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 67–87. (In Russian)

Egorycheva, I. D. (2005) Samorealizatsiya kak deyatel’nost’ (k postanovke problemy) [Self-realization as activity (on the problem definition)]. Mir psikhologii — World of Psychology, no. 3 (43), pp. 11–33. (In Russian)

Galazhinskij, E. V. (2002) Determinatsiya i napravlennost’ samorealizatsii lichnosti [Determination and orientation of self-realization of personality]. Tomsk: TGU Publ., 212 p. (In Russian)

Golovakha, E. I. (1988) Zhiznennaya perspektiva i professional’noe samoopredelenie molodezhi [Life perspective and professional self-determination of youth]. Kiev: Naukova dumka Publ., 142 p. (In Russian)

Goldstein, K. (1939) The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Co., 533 р. (In English)

Gozman, L. Ya., Kroz, M. V., Latinskaya, M. V. (1995) Samoaktualizatsionnyj test [Self-actualization test]. Moscow: Rossijskoe pedagogicheskoe agentstvo Publ., 43 p. (In Russian)

Korostyleva, L. A. (2000) Psikhologiya samorealizatsii lichnosti: brachno-semejnye otnosheniya [Psychology of self-realization of personality: Matrimonial relations]. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Publ., 292 p. (In Russian)

Kuleshov, S. M. (2011) Upravlenie professional’noj kar’eroj ofitserskogo korpusa [Management of professional career of the officer case]. Extended abstract of PhD dissertation (Sociology). Moscow, Military University, 25 p. (In Russian)

Leont’ev, D. A. (2000) Psikhologiya svobody: k postanovke problemy samodeterminatsij lichnosti [Freedom psychology: On the problem definition of person’s self-determinations]. Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 15–25. (In Russian)

Povarenkov, Yu. P., Samal, E. V. (2014) Professional’naya samoaktualizatsiya lichnosti: sistemogeneticheskij podkhod [Person’s professional self-actualization: Systemic genetic method]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky Publ., 328 p. (In Russian)

Rusalov, V. M. (2006) Psikhologicheskaya zrelost’: edinaya ili mnozhestvennaya kharakteristika? [Psychological maturity: Single or plural characteristic?] Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, no. 5, pp. 83–91. (In Russian)

Samal, E. V. (2008) Samoaktualizatsiya lichnosti v protsesse obucheniya v vuze [Self-actualization of the personality in the course of training in higher education institution]. PhD dissertation (Psychology). Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky, 245 p. (In Russian)

Sergienko, E. A. (2007) Zrelost’: molyarnyj ili modulyarnyj podkhod? [Maturity: Molar or modular method?] In: A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko (eds.). Fenomen i kategoriya zrelosti v psikhologii [A phenomenon and category of a maturity in psychology]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., pp. 13–28. (In Russian)

Stolyarskaya, E. V. (2001) Osobennosti samovospriyatiya i samoaktualizatsii lichnosti [Features of self-perception and self-actualization]. Psіkhalogіya, no. 2, pp. 5–11. (In Russian)

Yashchenko, E. F. (2006) Osobennosti samoaktualizatsii studentov s raznoj professional’noj napravlennost’yu [Features of self-actualization of students with different professional orientation]. Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 31–41. (In Russian)

Published

2020-11-17

Issue

Section

Articles