Communication behavior of students in a virtual classroom

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2020-2-3-247-256

Keywords:

communication behavior, virtual classroom, digital literacy, online training, crisis situation

Abstract

The article examines the author’s experience of communicating with students during the coronavirus crisis by means of the cyberethnographic observation method and establishes the changes in the university-level education process in general, and in distance learning in particular. These changes require a quick transformation of teaching methods, training materials, and assignment conditions. As a result of the study, a number of hypotheses were confirmed. The first hypothesis suggested that students prefer to receive information and instructions step by step through short descriptions, avoid reading theoretical texts, and focus on completing their assignments. The second hypothesis suggested that a virtual classroom provides opportunities for online learning, but there are technical, communicative and organizational difficulties in managing dialogue and learning in the new environment. The third hypothesis was that students initially use the Moodle chat to ask questions mainly on the assignments they have to do, and gradually transit to asking questions on the essence of the topics related to the educational material; the dialogue is fragmented and multi-layered. The observation sample was comprised of 120 full-time students studying the following academic disciplines: Public Speaking, Public Relations, Business Communication, and Communication Skills. According to the results of the research, in a virtual classroom, students prefer a step-by-step presentation of tasks and brief descriptions and instructions associated with the communicative model of pragmatism in organization and training. The highest results were observed under the conditions that involved the use of the possibilities offered by mass media. In the context of public online communication, it proved difficult to guide the dialogue and provide answers, as well as to use brainstorming and associative thinking techniques. Students tend to use the BigBlueButtonBN public chat mainly to ask questions about education process organization. When formulating ideas in the chat, they tend to show social desirability and reduce criticism. It is concluded that, although students quickly adapt to virtual classroom conditions, a virtual classroom cannot serve as the main channel of online learning.

References

Al-Hamad, N. Q., Al-Hamad, A. Q., Al-Omari, F. A. (2020) Smart devices employment in teaching and learning: reality and challenges in Jordan universities. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, article 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-020-0115-0 (In English)

Al-Mashhadani, M. A., Al-Rawe, M. F. (2018) The future role of mobile learning and smartphones applications in the Iraq private universities. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 5, article 28. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-018-0077-7 (In English)

Bower, M. (2006) Virtual classroom pedagogy. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 148–152. DOI: 10.1145/1124706.1121390 (In English)

Dacheva, G., Dzhonova, M. (2017) Ezikovata kultura i elektronnoto obuchenie [Language culture and e-learning]. In: Chuzhdiyat ezik i săvremennoto visshe obrazovanie: materialy ot VIII mezhdunarodnata nauchna konferentsiya, 23–25 juni 2017 goda, Varna [Foreign language and modern higher education: Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific Conference, June 23–25, Varna]. Varna: MU-Varna Publ., pp. 66–72. (In Bulgarian)

Dacheva, G., Tisheva, J., Dzhonova, M. (2016) Elektronnite kursove v obuchenieto na studenti filolozi [Electronic courses in the training of philology students]. In: I. Merdzhanova (ed.). Părva varnеnska konfеrеntsiya za еlеktronno obuchеniе i upravlеniе na znaniеto: Most mеzhdu srеdnoto i visshеto obrazovaniе [First Varna Conference on e-Learning and Knowledge Management: A bridge between secondary and higher education]. Varna: MU–Varna Publ., pp. 53–60. (In Bulgarian)

Dron, J. (2018) Smart learning environments, and not so smart learning environments: A systems views. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 5, article 25. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-018-0075-9 (In English)

Fashade, O. O., Salu, B. O., Salau, A. O. et al. (2017) Development of a VSAT based virtual e-learning system: (ARCSSTE-E as a Casestudy). International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 398–403. DOI: 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V48P269 (In English)

Friedrich, D. (2019) Effectiveness of peer review as cooperative web-based learning method applied out-of-class in a role playing game: A case study by quasi-experimental approach. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 6, article 19. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0102-5 (In English)

Halse, M., Mallinson, R., Foster, G. (2007) A Prototype live virtual classroom for shared tertiary instruction. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007). S. p.: s. n., pp. 117–119. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2007.33 (In English)

Kaware, S. S. (2015) Use of virtual classroom software for teaching. Scholarly Research Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, no. 17, pp. 3040–3047. (In English)

Murthy, D. (2008) Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 837–855. DOI: 10.1177/0038038508094565 (In English)

Murthy, D. (2011) Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In: Sh. N. Hesse-Biber (ed.). Handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 158–179. (In English)

Paskevicius, M., Irvine, V. (2019) Practicalities of implementing open pedagogy in higher education. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 6, article 23. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0110-5 (In English)

Peng, H., Ma, S., Spector, J. M. (2019) Personalized adaptive learning: An emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 6, article 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y (In English)

Rybas, N., Gajjala, R. (2007) Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, vol. 8, no. 3, article 35. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-8.3.282 (In English)

Sharma, K., Giannakos, M., Dillenbourg, P. (2019) Eye-tracking and artificial intelligence to enhance motivation and learning. Smart Learning Environments, vol. 7, article 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-020-00122-x (In English)

Simeonov, T. (2018) Kiberetnografiyata kato metod za izsledvane na virtualnoto prostranstvo [Cybertography as a method for studying virtual space]. Retorika i komunikatsii — Rhetoric and Communications, no. 36. [Online]. Available at: https://rhetoric.bg/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/simeonov-t-issue-36-September-project- FNI-2018.pdf (accessed 25.04.2020). (In Bulgarian)

Subramaniam, N. K., Kandasamy, M. (2011) The virtual classroom: A catalyst for institutional transformation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1388–1412. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.900 (In English)

Tsvetkova, N. (2018) Anglijski ezik za komunikatsiya v institutsiite na Evropejskiya săuz. Teoretiko-prilozhni aspekti [English language for communication in the institutions of the European Union. Theoretical and applied aspects]. Sofia: Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski Publ., 296 p. (In Bulgarian)

Published

2020-11-17

Issue

Section

Articles